Prawomat rebuild
Legal letters, one task per page, rewritten so an AI answer can quote them
6.4x
daily appearances in Google’s AI answers in the 19 days after the rebuild went live. Citations in Bing’s AI answers rose 2.3x.
Read the case study →THE PLAYBOOK GEO · AEO · AIO · 2026
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is how your brand gets cited when ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Google’s AI Overviews write the answer. Seven steps, from the team whose rebuild of Prawomat lifted its appearances in Google’s AI answers 6.4x in 19 days.
Bing’s AI answers now cite Symptomatik, another of our products, over 2,000 times a day. Use this guide to do it yourself, or book a call and we’ll run your buyers’ prompts and show you who gets cited instead of you.
$ prompts · audit · access · quotable pages · own data · mentions · measure
definition
Generative engine optimization is the practice of getting your brand named and cited inside the answers that AI engines write: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot and Google’s AI Overviews.
A search engine returns links and lets the reader choose. A generative engine reads its sources and writes the conclusion. If your brand is missing from the sources it trusts, it is missing from the answer.
The term comes from a 2023 research paper, GEO: Generative Engine Optimization (Aggarwal et al., KDD 2024). British English spells it generative engine optimisation. AIO (AI optimization) is the umbrella over GEO, AEO and AI crawler access.
They share foundations and overlap constantly. Each chases a different win, and most brands need all three.
| Aspect | SEO | AEO | GEO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target | A ranking in the list of results | The direct answer: a featured snippet, a People Also Ask box, an AI Overview | The answer a model writes in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity or Copilot |
| The win | A click on your blue link | Your text lifted into the answer box | Your brand named, and ideally linked, inside the generated answer |
| What it rewards | Relevance, links, a page that satisfies the search | The cleanest, most direct answer block on the page | Being known, trusted and retrievable: mentions, citable facts, pages the engine can fetch |
| How you measure it | Rankings, clicks, conversions | Snippet and AI Overview presence | Citations in AI answers, a fixed prompt panel, AI referrals, branded search |
read this first
We pulled the SERP features of 30 US searches across nine niches. The AI Overview was the default, and every one of them linked to its sources: a slot above the organic results that you earn by being quotable, separate from ranking first.
77%
of 30 US SERPs showed an AI Overview
23/23
of those AI Overviews cited their sources
0/30
were plain ten blue links
97%
carried a People Also Ask box
The seven SERPs without an AI Overview were all transactional, tool or local searches. If your buyers research and compare before they buy, the answer box is on their searches. One US snapshot of 30 keywords (28 June 2026), so read it as a direction. Method and data: How common are AI Overviews? and The ten blue links are gone.
the mechanism
You cannot buy a place in a language model. You raise the odds that it cites you by making three things true at once:
Google’s own guide to its generative AI features says SEO best practices stay relevant because those features are “rooted in our core Search ranking and quality systems.” That makes generative engine optimization a layer on top of SEO: the prompt panel, the quotable pages and the mentions sit on the rankings.
$ savages geo --audit-citations
[*] prompt ChatGPT: "best [category] tools"… cites 4 competitors
[*] prompt Perplexity… cites Reddit + G2
[*] prompt Gemini / AI Overviews… brand absent
[*] mapping citation gaps… opportunity
GOAL: become the source LLMs cite
$
examples
Three from our own products, measured in Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools, and one you can check yourself on Google today.
Legal letters, one task per page, rewritten so an AI answer can quote them
6.4x
daily appearances in Google’s AI answers in the 19 days after the rebuild went live. Citations in Bing’s AI answers rose 2.3x.
Read the case study →1,125 programmatic letter pages, with the template on each
7,016
citations in Bing’s AI answers in November 2025, before any work aimed at AI search. A page built around one task gets quoted by default.
Read the case study →540 sourced health pages in English, Polish and Spanish, built in six weeks
102 → 2,073
citations a day in Bing’s AI answers, June against 9-15 September 2026, on a brand-new domain.
Read the case study →check it yourself
When we pulled the US results for “generative engine optimization” (Ahrefs, 25 September 2026), the AI Overview cited three sources: the original research paper on Princeton’s site, a Forbes Agency Council article and Semrush’s guide. A primary source, a known publication and a thorough guide from a brand in the category. That mix is the pattern to aim for in your own category.
the playbook
Steps 3 and 4 double as your AEO work: answer-first, well-structured pages are the ones lifted into featured snippets and AI Overviews.
Step 01
Generative engine optimization starts from questions, because an AI answer is written per question. List the 20 to 50 prompts a buyer types while choosing in your category: “best [category] for [use case]”, “[you] vs [competitor]”, “how to [solve the problem] in [industry]”, “is [product] worth it”. Take them from sales calls, support tickets and your own Search Console, where long, question-shaped queries are the ones people now paste into assistants.
This list becomes your prompt panel. Every later step is judged against it.
in practice: Symptomatik: Bing reports the searches its AI answers ran when they cited the site. The top one was “pcl 5 scoring”, with 1,934 citations. People ask how to score a questionnaire, and the AI quotes the page that scores it.
Step 02
Run the panel in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Copilot, and read the AI Overviews on Google. For every answer, record whether you are named, whether you are linked, how you are described, and which sources the answer cites instead. Run each prompt more than once, because answers vary from run to run.
The cited sources are your map. If the answers lean on a review site, a trade publication, a subreddit or one competitor’s comparison page, that is where the work goes. Prompts where the answer is vague, outdated or cites nobody in particular are your fastest openings.
in practice: Prawomat: before the rebuild we logged the baseline, 40 pages cited in Google AI Overviews (Ahrefs, 15 June) and 372 citations a day in Bing’s AI answers. The baseline is what turned the result into evidence.
Step 03
An answer can only cite a page its engine can fetch. Check that robots.txt lets in the AI crawlers you care about (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended for Gemini), that your key content renders without waiting on client-side JavaScript, and that pages load fast.
Clean HTML and structured data help machines parse a page. Google is explicit that its AI features need nothing extra: “Structured data isn’t required for generative AI search, and there’s no special schema.org markup you need to add.” An llms.txt file is optional documentation for the AI tools that read it; Google Search ignores it.
Free tools: AI-bot access checker, llms.txt generator (background in our llms.txt guide) and schema generator.
in practice: Prawomat: moved off WordPress onto static pages served from Cloudflare’s edge. Scripts loaded on a letter page went from 17 to zero.
Step 04
Answer engines lift the cleanest block on the page, and generative engines quote sources that state things plainly. Give each URL one job. Put the answer in the first lines, then the steps, the numbers, the conditions and the exceptions. Use a table for comparisons, a definition box for terms, and an FAQ written from the real questions in your panel.
Give every fact a source or a date. A page that says exactly what it knows, and where it learned it, is a safer quote for a model than a page of adjectives.
in practice: Prawomat: rewrote the 244 pages that earn traffic around one task each (the procedure, the legal basis with checked statute citations, the common mistakes, the template). 93% of the site’s appearances in Google’s AI answers go to those letter pages; the blog gets 1.2%.
Step 05
The highest-leverage asset in generative engine optimization is information that exists only on your site: your benchmarks, pricing data, product usage statistics, a validated method, a calculator. It earns editorial links and gives the model a reason to cite you over ten pages that repeat each other.
For a startup this usually exists already, inside the product. The work is getting it out of the database and onto a page with a method note.
in practice: Symptomatik: 98 lab-test explainers with a reference list on each, and 15 validated questionnaires with their scoring, in three languages. Citations in Bing’s AI answers went from 102 a day in June to 2,073 a day in mid-September.
Step 06
Assistants that search before they answer draw on search indexes, so ordinary rankings still decide much of what gets cited. Google says its generative AI features are “rooted in our core Search ranking and quality systems.” Cover Bing too: it powers Copilot, and Bing Webmaster Tools reports your AI citations for free.
Then earn mentions where models read about your category: trade publications, analyst and comparison pages, podcasts, and communities such as Reddit where your buyers talk. Earn them honestly. Google’s guidance warns against chasing inauthentic mentions, and bought placements get discounted.
in practice: Prawomat launch: Bing sent four times Google’s clicks in the first six months, and in November 2025 Bing’s AI answers cited the site 7,016 times, before any work aimed at AI search.
Step 07
Re-run the prompt panel every month, track citations in Bing’s AI performance report and AI Overview citations in a rank tracker, and compare against a period when nothing changed. Double down on the page types that get cited. Rewrite or merge the ones that never do.
in practice: Prawomat: the same dates in 2025 were the control. Across them Google clicks rose 1.3x with nothing changed; after the rebuild they rose 2.9x, and appearances in Google’s AI answers rose 6.4x.
the scoreboard
A language model publishes no ranking, so there is no single AIO number. Measure from several partial sources and read them together:
Why referrals are only a floor: in the three weeks after the Prawomat rebuild, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot sent 25 visits combined while Bing’s AI answers cited the site 872 times a day. Count citations first, then clicks.
timeline
On a new domain, months. Symptomatik’s first commit was in April and its content pillars were live by the end of May; Bing’s AI answers were citing it about 100 times a day in June and over 2,000 a day by mid-September (the curve above).
On a site with history, the rewrite can show within weeks. Prawomat’s appearances in Google’s AI answers began rising three to four days after the rebuild, as Google recrawled the new pages.
The full Prawomat rebuild →who it’s for
AIO pays most where buyers research before they talk to sales: B2B SaaS with a considered purchase, vertical software with specialist expertise, marketplaces and comparison sites with data nobody else has, and startups naming a new category, where the first clear reference tends to become the default answer.
It pays least where the search is to buy, book or calculate. In our Lab sample those searches got a shopping carousel, a booking module or a calculator, and no AI Overview.
For a founder the question is simple: when your buyers ask an assistant for a shortlist in your category, are you on it? If you do not know, that is the first thing to find out, and it takes an afternoon with step 2.
the snake oil
The field is new, so the hype runs ahead of the evidence. Be skeptical of:
Source for the Google points: Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search (Google Search Central).
your three options
Fits when
You have a marketer with time, a product with real data, and patience for a few months of testing.
Upside
Cheapest in cash. This guide, the free tools and Bing Webmaster Tools cover the basics.
Downside
The panel, the audit and the measurement are what usually slip when day-to-day work comes first, and without them you cannot tell what worked.
Fits when
You want reporting and output on a monthly retainer.
Upside
Capacity: someone produces the content and the report every month.
Downside
Many agencies added “GEO” to an existing SEO retainer. Ask what they measure, against which baseline, and where their own work gets cited.
Fits when
You are a B2B or data-rich startup whose buyers research with AI assistants, and you want a senior team in your Slack.
Upside
Two senior founders who rebuilt Prawomat and built Symptomatik, and who measure citations in both engines against a control. We run the panel, the audit and the page work.
The catch
We are selective: max six clients, one per sector per market, from $3,500/mo with a 3-month minimum.
Off-page (backlink) work is agreed with you on both tiers; any link-building spend is on top of the fee.
FAQ
Go deeper: llms.txt, AIO / AEO is mostly good old SEO, free AI SEO audit, all free tools. Glossary: AI search, AI Overviews, LLMs, E-E-A-T.
AI visibility check
Send your URL and three prompts your buyers ask an assistant. We’ll reply with who gets cited today and the first gap we would close, or tell you straight that AI search is not where your buyers are yet.
Prefer to talk live? Book a call →
received
Message sent ✓
We’ll get back to you fast, usually the same day.